Alejo Sanchez Quilez vs Nicolas Rafael Goldberg Alviani Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

In terms of second serve performance over recent months, Quilez has an edge, winning 43.29% of points from their second serve compared to Alviani’s 38.66%. This is a key statistic often linked to predicting match outcomes. Looking at returning capabilities, Alviani has been slightly more effective in recent form, winning 49.14% of second serve return points, eclipsing Quilez’s 46.7%. However, Quilez leads in first serve returns, capturing 31.31% while Alviani captures 27.59%. This data provides a nuanced prediction model in their matchup.

Under pressure, Alviani has shown resilience, saving 56.36% of breakpoints, surpassing Quilez’s 54.21%. This statistic is particularly helpful for gauging in-match betting scenarios. When assessing performance across the past year, Quilez boasts a win rate of 49.25% compared to Alviani’s 36.96%, indicating a broader edge in their overall performance. Surface preferences reveal Quilez’s proficiency on hard courts with a 60% win rate, while Alviani prefers clay, achieving a 36% win rate on this surface.

Analyzing the level of competition, Quilez’s average opponent ranking over the past 12 months stands at 357.67, quite different from Alviani’s encounters with higher-ranked players averaging 15.98. In deciding set situations, Quilez demonstrates superior ability, winning 61% of such sets as against Alviani’s 58%. This is crucial for predicting match outcomes that extend into close contests.

Quilez plays primarily in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments at the $10K level, maintaining a balanced win rate of 50%, while Alviani plays in similar-tier events with a win rate of 36.96%. This context reveals significant insights into their experience levels. Regarding breakpoint conversions, Alviani edges out slightly, converting 42.11% of opportunities compared to Quilez’s 38.51%, a valuable aspect for predicting in-game shifts.

Combining these insights, the statistics currently favor Quilez for an anticipated victory, based predominantly on their overall performance metrics, surface adaptability, and deciding set prowess. Therefore, Quilez is more likely to emerge victorious in their forthcoming match.